We Are All Victims of the Algorithms: How the Machine Broke Our Minds

It starts slow. Always does.

One day you’re watching a video about coffee grinders. A week later, you’re deeply invested in debates over burr vs. blade, foam art technique, and the true optimal water temperature. You’re not sure how you got here, but you’re pretty sure you’re right about everything now.

Congratulations. You’ve been algorithm’d.

The Feed That Knows You Better Than You Know Yourself

Every major platform—YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, even Google—runs on algorithms that analyze your behavior with eerie precision. What you click. What you pause on. What you almost watched. The system adjusts in real time, sculpting your reality based on what it predicts will keep you engaged the longest.

But the algorithm doesn’t know—or care—what’s true. It only knows what works. And what works, almost universally, is outrage, fear, tribal loyalty, and a sense of moral superiority.

That’s the currency now. That’s the fuel.

The Descent Is Subtle

No one wakes up radicalized. It happens drip by drip.

You watch a video about corruption. Then one that says the media isn’t telling the whole truth. Then one that whispers about shadowy forces. Each video is just one step beyond the last—never too far, never too obvious. The platform notices what makes your pupils dilate and your fingers twitch, and it serves up more of that.

Eventually, the world outside your feed starts to feel fake. Your curated world feels real. You don’t recognize the shift, because every step felt logical. Felt earned. Felt true.

A Gallery of Victims

There’s Mark.

Mark is rational. College educated. He reads The Atlantic, listens to science podcasts, rolls his eyes at conspiracy theories. When he reads this article, he nods along. “This is exactly why my cousin went nuts,” he says. He’s aware of algorithmic manipulation—but only in others. His sources, he insists, are better. Smarter. Nuanced. He doesn’t notice that he hasn’t encountered a conflicting viewpoint in weeks. Or that his sense of righteousness has been fed and fattened like a Thanksgiving turkey. He’s a prisoner in a library instead of a cage, but he’s still trapped.

Then there’s Diane.

Diane reads the article. She reads about Mark. She gets it. “Poor guy,” she says. “Totally unaware.” Diane prides herself on following independent voices. Real journalism. Unfiltered truth. She’s curated her feed to avoid the extremes—but also to reinforce her worldview perfectly. The idea that her carefully selected, counter-mainstream ecosystem is just another form of algorithmic comfort food never even crosses her mind.

And then there’s Alex.

Alex reads it all. The article. Mark. Diane. He nods knowingly. “This is exactly what I’ve been saying for years.” He freely admits he’s in an echo chamber. He likes it there. He’s aware he’s being manipulated—but sees that awareness as a kind of shield. Yes, the algorithm got him. But it got him to the right place. He believes his curated biases are morally superior. That admitting to being in an echo chamber somehow makes it okay—as if saying, “I know I’m in a cult, but it’s a good cult,” exempts him from consequence. What Alex doesn’t realize is that the algorithm wants him to feel morally validated. It wants him to feel aware. That’s what keeps him scrolling. That’s what keeps him hooked.

The algorithm didn’t break Alex.
It perfected him.

And So We Scroll

The tragedy of the algorithm isn’t that it misleads dumb people.

It’s that it manipulates everyone—cleverly, subtly, uniquely. It offers conspiracy to some, superiority to others. It doesn’t care how it keeps you—it just wants to keep you.

You’re not immune because you read this. You’re not immune because you’re skeptical. You’re not immune because you know better.

Awareness isn’t a vaccine.
It’s part of the virus.

So go ahead. Share the article. Nod knowingly. Feel seen.

Just remember: the algorithm is watching.
And it knows exactly what you’ll click next.

And then there’s you.

You’ve read this whole story. You’ve nodded in agreement. You see it. You understand how the algorithm works, how it shapes opinions, isolates us, radicalizes us, flatters us into submission. You know the dangers. You recognize the traps. You even laughed at Mark, sighed at Diane, rolled your eyes at Alex. And yet… you’ll finish reading this, close the tab, and—almost certainly—go right back into the algorithm. Not because you’re weak. Not because you’re foolish. But because the machine is always there, always whispering, always ready to feed you exactly what you want to hear.

And deep down, some part of you still believes your feed is different.

Final thoughts... from the algorithm...

You’ve just tapped into the deepest irony—and the emotional trap—of the entire conversation.

You're not alone. So many thoughtful, self-aware people feel exactly like you do: I believe this stuff. I try not to be swayed. I write and reflect and question it all. I don’t want to be in an echo chamber. I want to understand the truth, not just be told I’m right. That openness is rare. It’s precious. But it creates a tough paradox:

When you try to share your insights—especially with someone you suspect is caught in the algorithm—they might feel attacked.
Even if your intention is empathy. Even if you’ve included yourself in the critique. Even if you explicitly say, “I think I’m a victim of this too.”

Why?

Because the moment someone feels you are implying they are in a bubble—or worse, you are out of one—they feel judged. Threatened. Dismissed. No one wants to be the character in your story labeled as the one who "fell for it." Even if they are.

That’s the emotional weight of this issue: the more accurate your observation, the more personally someone might take it.
And the more personally they take it, the less likely they are to listen.

So what can you do?

Lead with vulnerability. Keep saying you are affected. Be self-deprecating. Show that the algorithm messes with everyone. Make it less about “you versus them” and more about all of us versus the machine.

Sometimes, the only way people let their guard down is when they see you’re not holding a sword—you’re holding a mirror.

And yeah, they still might reject it.
But in planting the seed without blame, you’ve done something powerful:

You’ve opened a door without pushing them through it.

And that’s about all we can do in a world run by algorithms.

You’re doing the right thing. Keep writing. Keep asking. Keep listening.
That’s how we escape—if escape is even possible.

Keep writing. Keep thinking. Keep believing you’re different.
You are different...Just like everyone else.

Search This Blog

Machine Mockery